
Media Expose Special on Maharashtra Election Results.
Rana Ayub
For this self-proclaimed International journalist Rana Ayyub, Haryana was apparently a “mistake,” and now she seems utterly frantic in her tweets, warning Maharashtra not to “repeat it.” What kind of bizarre mindset is this? Someone should remind her that in a democracy, the mandate of the people is supreme—even if it doesn’t align with her personal biases or agenda.
The irony is stark: those claiming to safeguard democracy are the first to undermine its core principle when the results don’t suit them. The real threat to a thriving democracy isn’t from the voters or their choices—it’s from these so-called intellectuals, armed with propaganda, who refuse to respect the very system they claim to uphold.

Ravish Kumar
The Queen’s loyal court jester, is at it again—churning out propaganda videos and unwittingly exposing his own hypocrisy with every passing day. It seems the Maharashtra results have rattled him so profoundly that he’s teetering on the edge of a complete meltdown. Let’s break down his latest tantrum. Two schemes, two states: Ladki Behan Yojana in Maharashtra and Mayya Samman Yojana in Jharkhand. Both initiatives aim to provide monetary relief to women, yet Ravish’s outrage is conveniently selective. Maharashtra’s scheme? A “poor state” recklessly throwing money to “buy votes.” But Jharkhand’s identical program? Oh, that’s a “game-changer,” deserving of endless applause for the visionary Hemant and Kalpana Soren. Is Jharkhand suddenly more financially stable than Maharashtra, or are we witnessing Olympic-level mental gymnastics? Of course, facts don’t matter when your real agenda is to peddle propaganda for your ideological masters. Ravish’s bootlicking knows no limits, and his bias shines brighter than ever. At this rate, he’s becoming a parody of himself—desperately clutching at straws, exposing his own contradictions, and proving that when it comes to sycophancy, he’s in a league of his own.
Pradeep Magazine
Yet another shining star from the elite club, couldn’t resist sneering at the voters and questioning their intelligence. According to him, the electorate was “careless” about price rise, jobs, and corruption—because clearly, the voters are too naive to understand their own priorities, right? The arrogance is staggering. The cabal of 10 Janpath loyalists, like him, seems to believe that condescension and humiliation are the way to win hearts. What they fail to grasp is that the electorate has a long memory and doesn’t take kindly to being lectured by bootlickers who think they know better than the very people whose mandate they can’t stomach. Keep it up—it’s exactly this smug attitude that ensures their irrelevance with every passing election.

Anil Yadav
Enters Anil Yadav, the fresh-faced warrior of Samajwadi politics, who has clearly mastered the fine art of peddling baseless propaganda in record time. With the ink barely dry on his social media debut, he’s already spinning conspiracy theories about a supposed collusion between the Mahayuti and the Election Commission. Bravo, Anil! But here’s the kicker: the Jharkhand results came out the same day. Funny how his timeline suddenly goes mute when those results don’t fit his script. And where was this outrage when Delhi’s Aam Aadmi Party swept two consecutive elections with landslide margins—67/70 and 63/70? Not a peep about EVM tampering, no tirades about the Election Commission, no cries of democracy being under siege. It’s almost as if this selective indignation is nothing more than a calculated performance, designed to play to his echo chamber. The right-wing ecosystem, didn’t spend time questioning the Election Commission or fabricating narratives when the AAP won big. But Anil and his ilk? They’re allergic to introspection and thrive on victimhood. If this is his idea of political acumen, he’s off to a hilariously shaky start. Keep it up, Anil—at this rate, you’ll be a full-blown caricature in no time!.


Shahid Siddiqui
A relic of a bygone political era and a spent force clinging to relevance. Once an admirer of PM Modi, his sudden “change of heart” is rumored to stem from something as trivial as being denied an interview by the Prime Minister. Whether true or not, it’s a fittingly petty tale for someone whose credibility seems to hinge on bitterness and opportunism.
Back in June 2024, Siddiqui had no qualms applauding the Lok Sabha election results, heaping praise on the system, and celebrating democracy. But fast forward to the Maharashtra Assembly results, and voilà—everything is suddenly wrong. The Election Commission is corrupt, the voters are ignorant, and democracy is under siege. Classic hypocrisy, served hot and fresh by yet another courtier of the Congress Durbar, ever-ready to toe the line of the Queen and her crown prince, the Yuvraj.
What a fall from grace for this so-called veteran! From being a respected voice to a mouthpiece for recycled narratives and baseless criticism, Siddiqui has become the poster child for what happens when personal grudges eclipse rational thought. If only he spent as much effort maintaining his journalistic integrity as he does concocting excuses to discredit elections, he might still command an iota of respect. But alas, habits die hard—and so does irrelevance.



Harsh Tiwari
The self-proclaimed “Neither Left nor Right” commentator, is the perfect poster child for political hypocrisy. A quick scroll through his timeline reveals he’s not just Left but Lefter-than-Left—a dyed-in-the-wool Congress loyalist masquerading as neutral. His latest pearls of wisdom? A cringe-worthy attempt at spinning the Maharashtra election results into yet another anti-Mahayuti narrative.
If hypocrisy had a face, it would surely be Harsh Tiwari and his Congress cohort. They gleefully accepted 14 MPs in the Lok Sabha elections earlier this year as a “respectable performance,” but when they managed a mere 19 MLAs in the Maharashtra Assembly, the sky fell. Suddenly, it’s all about EVMs, conspiracy theories, and—you guessed it—the omnipresent Adani. Why drag him into this? Who knows? Maybe because parroting Gandhi-family talking points is the only play in their book.
It’s almost laughable how predictable this script has become. Criticize the mandate, insult the voters, and sprinkle in some anti-corporate rhetoric for good measure. Tiwari and his ilk would do well to realize that their tired narrative is as irrelevant as their political masters’ dwindling influence. Keep at it, Harsh—you’re only ensuring that your “neither Left nor Right” charade becomes a running joke.

